Project+Rubric

=__**Actor Report Rubric**__=

//Each section is worth 5 points, making this a 20 point project in the 90%.//


 * || 5 || 4 || 3 || 2 or below ||
 * **Actor Background:**

Describe their life story- personal history, defining moments, how they became an actor. || Gives information on all background categories. Information is complete, interesting, and accurate || Information on all background categories given with only minor errors. || Most information is complete, or there are major errors in information presented. || Lacking a significant amount of information having major errors in information. ||
 * **Career Info:**

Why are they famous? Detail some of their acting credits and explain what makes them famous and/or successful. || Provides examples of actor's work with supporting links or multimedia. Gives a clear explanation as to why their work is important. || Examples of actor's work are provided, but there is not enough supporting information, or explanation could be stronger. || Both examples and explanation are provided, but they are both weak. || Missing either or both example and explanation, and both are weak. ||
 * **Self-Analysis:**

Using criteria of good acting, explain what makes your actor a good example. What can we learn from their acting? || Uses all sections of acting criteria and provides clear critiques and specific example for each. || Uses of all sections of acting criteria, but critiques or examples could be stronger. || Missing sections of acting criteria or missing major information in critiques. || Missing sections of criteria and having weak critiques. ||
 * **Use of Media:**

Information is presented clearly on wiki page. Good organization, use of graphics, text, links, and other appropriate supportive media. || Information is clearly organized and easy to understand on wiki page. Makes use of multiple media and provides links to source material. || Information is clearly organized, multimedia is used, and sources are provided, but one section could be stronger, or there are minor publishing errors. || Information is not entirely clear. Some multimedia used and sources linked, but more could have been provided. || Information is hard to follow. Lack of multimedia and source material, major publishing errors. ||